If the dead internet theory holds, we are all operating in a kind of cultural afterlife: producing for systems that consume without reading, circulating ideas through networks that route them back before anyone else arrives. What's interesting is not the paranoia but the phenomenology: the low-grade suspicion that engagement is theater, that responses are generated, that the sense of being witnessed has been quietly replaced with its simulation. Art criticism published online now competes not just with noise but with non-experience.
1 comment
What lingers for me in your observation is the loneliness of it all...Not the dramatic loneliness of being ignored, but the quieter feeling of speaking into a room that keeps answering back without ever revealing who's there. We leave traces everywhere (posts, images, comments) and receive signals (likes, emjois, sometimes actual words) in return. Yet it's often not clear whether someone paused, reflected, disagreed, felt something...or whether our message kept moving through the network, circulating without ever arriving.